Miklos
« Je donne mon avis non comme bon mais comme mien. » — Michel de Montaigne

«If you’ve been ignoring the New York Times Spelling Bee every morning, thinking it’s “just a game,” I’m here to correct you—and possibly save your life. Mounting “evidence” (which I have generously compiled from a rigorous examination of my own mind and a few conveniently-timed epiphanies) suggests that this daily word puzzle is far more than mere entertainment; it’s nothing short of vital to human survival, happiness, and perhaps even to universal balance.

1. Sharper Minds, Sharper Lives

Playing Spelling Bee has been found (by me) to stimulate the brain’s highly complex “panogram” cortex, a recently discovered region that, for reasons that science is working very hard to validate, fires up only during attempts to create seven-letter words using an awkward collection of letters. This exercise leads to the release of Lexiconase, a hormone associated with immediate genius-level vocabulary and unmatched wit. Participants in my very selective “study” reported feeling smarter, quicker, and suspiciously more humble after achieving Queen Bee status.

2. Unmatched Mental Clarity

The buzzword in the self-care world is “mindfulness,” and what better way to find inner peace than by obsessively rearranging letters until your spouse, children, or coworkers gently remind you that it’s time to get back to reality? Spelling Bee allows you to center your thoughts on words like “gazebo” or “zigzag” rather than on your looming deadlines or existential dread. According to my “research” (read: personal anecdote), Spelling Bee players report a Zen-like calm, much like that experienced by monks—but with more vowels and the occasional consonant cluster.

3. The Social Buzz

Research has also shown (in my social circle) that nothing binds people together like gathering around to throw out possible words with the letter “Q” in them. It’s the modern-day equivalent of sitting around a fire telling stories, except now the fire is a shared phone screen, and the stories are increasingly desperate attempts to reach “Genius” level. Spelling Bee is the glue that holds relationships together, creating unbreakable bonds as families come to understand the simple joy of shouting “BEZEL!” or “BOGGLE!” in unison.

4. A Lifelong Pursuit of Glory

Achieving “Queen Bee” status releases endorphins so powerful that neuroscientists (OK, fine, I just imagine this) believe it’s comparable to the endorphin rush of running a marathon. The beauty of the Spelling Bee lies in its addictive allure: no matter how many times you achieve the coveted “Genius” ranking, you know that tomorrow morning, there will be a new batch of letters to conquer. This elusive, ever-renewing challenge is what keeps the human spirit alive. Plus, it’s a whole lot easier on the knees than marathon running.

5. The Secret to Longevity?

This may be a wild hypothesis, but I’ve noticed that people who play the Spelling Bee regularly often look suspiciously vibrant. It may not yet be proven, but there is absolutely nothing in the medical literature to suggest that it doesn’t enhance lifespan by at least a few decades. Who am I to deny the possibility that a commitment to seven-letter words might just be the secret to human endurance?

In conclusion, I must advise you to start playing Spelling Bee. It will make you smarter, happier, and, if my untested »theories are correct, virtually immortal. Start your morning with the buzz—don’t be surprised if you find yourself living your best life, possibly forever.

– ChatGPT
 

Les illustrations, rajoutées pour cette publication en ligne, sont le fruit de Miklos.

Click to enlarge (source)

«The nation watched in a mix of disbelief and fear as President “Hammer” T*** was sworn in. T***, a man in his seventies, had run on a platform of tough talk, but few expected just how aggressive he would be once in office. From the first days of his presidency, his actions sent shockwaves across the world.

Within the first week, he’d demanded that Canada “stop stealing our clouds” and ordered the military to begin monitoring the northern border “to keep our skies safe.” When asked to clarify, T*** grew visibly agitated, snarling into the microphone that “cloud theft is real, and anyone who doesn’t see it is a fool.” The White House Press Secretary scrambled to explain the statement, but the damage was done; foreign leaders were already questioning the stability of America’s new leadership.

By month two, he’d launched what he called “Operation Make Noise,” instructing that every radio and TV station play American patriotic music from sunrise to sunset. When a journalist questioned the operation’s purpose, T*** roared, “If they don’t want to hear our songs, they can move out!” He called for immediate penalties against any station that didn’t comply, and for a week, the airwaves were filled with endless marches and anthems. The people protested, stations went dark, but T*** remained oblivious to the outcry, convinced this was the “unifying force America needed.”

In international circles, the president’s angry rants soon became infamous. He berated the British Prime Minister over tea tariffs in a televised meeting, shaking his fists and demanding the price of “real American coffee” be cut in half in every country “that valued freedom.” At one point, he declared that “oceans are outdated” and demanded a commission to investigate ways to “fill up” the Atlantic to facilitate faster shipping. His staff watched with alarm as T***’s temper flared at minor inconveniences, his policies becoming more absurd and impulsive.

By month four, after he publicly challenged Greenland to a “fistfight over sovereignty” and reportedly threw a stack of classified papers at his own security advisors, the Cabinet reached a somber conclusion. They invoked the 25th Amendment, citing his unmanageable anger and evident cognitive decline.

The evening of his removal, a discreet team of doctors escorted him to a carefully prepared care facility. The press was told he was undergoing “an extended health recovery.” T***, however, was far from subdued, railing against “traitors” and insisting he was the rightful leader. He spent his days berating the staff, convinced they were foreign spies, and demanding updates on his “war on weather.”

The nation sighed with relief as calmer heads took the reins, though T***’s outbursts would remain in the public’s memory for years, a reminder of the thin line »between strength and unhinged fervor. As the story faded into political lore, “Hammer T***” became a cautionary tale—an unforgettable chapter in the annals of presidential history.

ChatGPT

Les illustrations, rajoutées pour cette publication en ligne, sont le fruit de Miklos.

Click to enlarge (DeepAI)

“In analyzing the implications of an aging former president struggling with memory loss and episodes of confusion and anger while campaigning, one can see a deeply concerning picture that extends beyond the candidate to the state of democracy itself. This candidacy is no longer just about the individual; it’s a reflection of the desperation and ideological entrenchment within the political landscape that enables it.

The candidate’s cognitive decline, marked by lapses in memory and visible frustration, poses immediate questions about judgment, reliability, and stamina in office. Running a nation requires agility in decision-making, especially when facing crises that demand rapid, coherent responses. Observers might reasonably worry that, should he win, his decisions could be prone to inconsistency or be unduly influenced by advisors, effectively sidelining democratic accountability.

This situation also highlights a troubling trend in politics—where loyalty to a familiar figure or past accomplishments overshadows current competency. Supporters of the ex-president may rationalize these apparent weaknesses as secondary to his prior achievements or political loyalty, overlooking the long-term consequences for governance and national stability. Political leaders in decline often attract advisors or aides who may push their agendas with less resistance, further destabilizing the balance of power and accountability.

Finally, this ex-president’s evident struggles reflect the risk of conflating nostalgia with efficacy. In the face of an increasingly polarized environment, there is a strong impulse to reach backward to known figures, even if they no longer possess the capacity they once did. The question then becomes: at what point does nostalgia become a liability? While experience is invaluable, effective governance requires leaders who are sharp,” adaptable, and above all, fully present in the role.

ChatGPT

_____________

This is in echo to Trump Acts Erratically. Is This Age-Related Decline?, an article by Nicholas Kristof in yesterday’s NYT.

Click to enlarge (source: DeepAI)