Miklos
« Je donne mon avis non comme bon mais comme mien. » — Michel de Montaigne

This blog is © Miklos. Do not copy, download or mirror the site or portions thereof, or else your ISP will be blocked. 

12 juillet 2025

Dialogue with ChatGPT: Are drafts of paintings works of art in and of themselves?

Classé dans : Arts et beaux-arts, Peinture, dessin, Progrès, Sciences, techniques — Miklos @ 21:30

Click to enlarge. Source: Whisk.

Question:

Are drafts of paintings works of art in and of themselves?

ChatGPT reply:

Yes, drafts of paintings can absolutely be considered works of art in and of themselves. Their artistic value depends on several factors:

  1. Intent and Expression: If the draft captures the artist’s expression, vision, or emotion—even if unfinished—it can stand alone as an artwork.
  2. Historical and Creative Insight: Drafts often reveal the creative process, decisions, and struggles of the artist, which many consider deeply valuable and artistic in their own right.
  3. Aesthetic Quality: Some drafts have visual qualities—gesture, spontaneity, rawness—that appeal to viewers as much as, or more than, polished works.
  4. Art World Recognition: Many museums and collectors recognize and exhibit sketches and drafts (e.g., Leonardo da Vinci’s anatomical sketches or Turner’s watercolor studies) as important artworks.

In short: while a draft may be incomplete in a technical sense, it can still be a complete artistic expression.

Question:

But is the white sheet, already chosen and cut by the artist, also a work of art?

ChatGPT reply:

This touches on a profound philosophical question in aesthetics: what qualifies as art, and when does something become art?
 
If an artist selects and cuts a white sheet with intentionality, treating the act of choosing, sizing, and presenting it as part of an expressive or conceptual process, then yes, it can be considered a work of art.
 
Several movements support this idea:

  • Conceptual Art: Here, the idea behind the work often holds more weight than its physical form. Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain (a signed urinal) and Yves Klein’s The Void (an empty gallery) are classic examples. The chosen white sheet could similarly embody a concept—emptiness, potential, silence, purity, etc.
  • Minimalism: Artists like Robert Ryman created works that appear almost blank, but where the texture, edges, or materials were meticulously chosen. The white surface becomes a field of subtle variation and meaning.
  • Process Art: In this view, the act of choosing and preparing the sheet might itself be the artwork—art as gesture or decision.

However, without context or intention, a white sheet may not be perceived as art by others. It’s the artist’s declared or implied meaning that transforms an object from « material » to « artwork. » So:

A white sheet, when chosen and cut by the artist with expressive or conceptual intent, can be a work of art.
Without that intent, it likely remains just a sheet.

The boundary is fragile—and that ambiguity is part of what makes contemporary art so rich and challenging.

Question:

How can one know the intent of the artist, if he is dead? and so, is the blank page he left a work of art or not?

ChatGPT reply:

This is the heart of a deep and unresolved aesthetic question:
Can a work of art exist without the artist’s declared intent—especially if the artist is no longer alive to clarify it?

1. The Problem of Intent (and Its Absence)

If the artist is dead, we can’t ask them. That leaves us with:

  • Clues in context: Where was the blank page found? In a studio full of finished works? With notes nearby? In a frame on a wall?
  • Consistency with their practice: Did the artist previously use blankness or minimal gestures in their art?
  • Testimonies or writings: Did they write about leaving things unfinished or working with silence, absence, or negation?

But even with all this, uncertainty remains. That’s why some philosophers (like Wimsatt and Beardsley in The Intentional Fallacy) argue we should judge art without depending on intent—focusing instead on the work itself and its effect on the audience.

2. So Is the Blank Page a Work of Art?

Possibly. But not certainly.
There are three main positions:

  • Yes, it is art, because:
    • It was left in the artist’s studio, deliberately selected and placed.
    • Its blankness can be interpreted as a final gesture—silence, emptiness, a challenge.
    • The viewer brings meaning: “This blank page moved me. It made me think. It is art.”
  • No, it is not, because:
    • There’s no evidence of intent.
    • It might be an unused sheet, nothing more.
    • Without transformation or declaration, it remains material, not message.
  • It depends: The status of the blank page is ambiguous—neither definitively art nor not-art, but suspended in a grey zone where interpretation, context, and curatorial decisions play a key role.

Final Thought

Art lives not just in the object, but in the relationship between object, context, and viewer. A blank page left by a dead artist becomes art if we treat it as art—but that act is ours to make, and not a certainty to uncover.

Or as the poet might say:

“The silence he left—is it the end, or the work itself?”


This conversation gave rise to this idea.

Pas de commentaire »

Pas encore de commentaire.

Flux RSS des commentaires de cet article. TrackBack URI

Laisser un commentaire

XHTML: Vous pouvez utiliser ces balises : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

The Blog of Miklos • Le blog de Miklos